Copper compounds trace their roots deep into civilization. Long before modern chemistry took shape, people extracted copper salts from the earth and used them in everything from pigments to early medicines. Copper hydroxide, with its distinct blue-green color, caught the attention of Renaissance alchemists. They blended copper salts and alkaline solutions, often ending up with an impure paste that painters sometimes mashed into oil for color. Fast forward, the nineteenth century saw scientists isolating this compound in purer form. Its uses grew as agriculture advanced; farmers sprayed it on crops, fighting fungal diseases and safeguarding harvests. Experience in older orchards taught many that blue residue from Bordeaux mixture, anchored by copper hydroxide, meant fewer losses. This trust, built over years of harvest and observation, carved out a place for copper in the toolkit of plant health.
Copper hydroxide stands out, not just for its color but for its versatile nature. You spot it on farm supply shelves as a blue fungicide or blended in laboratory glassware for chemistry lessons. Large-scale manufacturers ship it globally, branding it as an active ingredient in both crop treatments and catalyst preparations. Bags labeled for farming highlight purity and copper percentage, with clear warnings about safe handling and environmental care. Those working in labs recognize its value in synthesizing other copper compounds and find it a go-to in experiments that need a reliable source of copper ions. Some classrooms experiment with mixing copper sulfate and sodium hydroxide to produce the characteristic turquoise precipitate, teaching chemistry’s foundational reactions.
Copper hydroxide presents itself as a pale blue or blue-green powder, often feeling slightly gritty in the hands of experienced lab technicians. Its molecular formula is Cu(OH)2. Unlike many other salts, it refuses to dissolve in water and sinks stubbornly to the bottom of a beaker. Heat doesn’t treat it kindly: as temperatures climb past 80°C, it starts to break down, releasing water and leaving behind a black residue of copper oxide. In acids, the powder disappears with a fizz, forming copper salts instead. Its low solubility, around 3.4 × 10−6 g/L at room temperature, has shaped its uses—staying put on leaves rather than washing away in a summer shower.
Product labels don’t mince words. Copper hydroxide powders intended for agriculture typically guarantee a minimum copper content—many advertise around 50-58% as metallic copper. Labels flag impurities to avoid unintentional soil or crop contamination. Fineness matters, so many products pass through sieves with mesh sizes marked clearly; clumps or agglomerates earn a rejection from quality control. Color uniformity provides a quick visual check for buyers and end users. Safety icons warn about necessary protection for skin and eyes, directed by international standards. Pesticide registration numbers and manufacturing batch details help track quality from production to final application.
Lab workers often reach for copper sulfate and sodium hydroxide to create copper hydroxide on demand. Mixing these two solutions, a blue precipitate forms almost instantly and settles at the bottom of the vessel. Rinsing and filtering this solid removes excess ions, yielding a purer product. Large-scale producers improve this process, using controlled temperatures, precise dosing, and filtered water to produce batches consistently. Waste streams and byproducts are managed with strict oversight, both to conserve copper resources and to protect workers and the environment. Production methods continue to adapt, especially in response to modern regulations clamping down on contaminants and emissions.
Copper hydroxide reacts with acids, dissolving swiftly to form copper salts such as copper(II) sulfate or copper(II) nitrate. Exposing it to heat strips away water, yielding copper(II) oxide—a black powder that’s familiar in both ceramics and chemical industries. If you add it to ammonia solutions, it transforms again, forming deep blue complexes used in analytical chemistry. Researchers spend time tweaking particle size and surface area by altering precipitation conditions or introducing modifiers during synthesis. These changes affect performance in fungicides and extend its use in chemical catalysis or battery research. Outside the lab, observations show that painted copper surfaces exposed to air and rain slowly convert to a natural patina of copper hydroxycarbonates and copper hydroxide, a reminder of nature’s slow but constant chemistry.
In plant protection texts and chemical supply catalogs, you’ll hear copper hydroxide called cupric hydroxide or simply “blue copper.” It sits on ingredient lists of fungicides under trade names that highlight its elemental copper content. Some markets market it as a stabilized “copper hydroxide complex,” emphasizing modifications that resist clumping. Old textbooks list it as ‘hydrated copper oxide,’ although today’s labeling trends favor clarity and precision to avoid confusion and comply with updated regulations.
Copper hydroxide demands respect in the field and the lab. Inhalation of dust or direct skin contact can irritate, so handlers wear gloves, goggles, and sometimes respirators. Standards from groups like OSHA, NIOSH, and the EU REACH regulation guide personal protection and set exposure limits for copper compounds. Spills require prompt cleanup to avoid environmental contamination. Manufacturers post Safety Data Sheets with instructions on first aid and spill management. Agricultural labels warn about buffer zones near water bodies, as runoff can damage aquatic ecosystems. Disposal involves hazardous waste protocols to keep copper levels in check outside the intended areas.
Agriculture soaks up the majority of copper hydroxide supplied worldwide. Orchardists spray it to prevent fungal attacks on apples, citrus, and nuts, as well as leaf diseases on tomatoes or potatoes. Vineyard owners have built decades of experience using copper products to fight downy and powdery mildew. Beyond farming, laboratories use copper hydroxide as a starting point for preparing other copper compounds or as a mild oxidizer. Some wastewater treatment plants use copper-based chemicals to reduce algae growth. Artists even value its color when recreating historical pigments or restoring old paintings.
Scientists look to copper hydroxide as a platform for new materials. In batteries and supercapacitors, modified copper hydroxide forms part of electrode research aiming for higher capacity and better stability. Nanotechnology harnesses control over its particle size for greater reactivity. Agronomy research focuses on alternatives that release less copper into soils, to balance effective disease control with fewer environmental risks. Analytical chemists develop new extraction techniques and sensors using the unique chemistry of copper hydroxide complexes. In classrooms, educators use it as an approachable way to demonstrate acid-base reactions and complex formation.
Toxicologists dig into copper’s persistence in soils and its effect on non-target species. Excess copper from repeated spraying builds up in orchard soils, hindering microbial activity and worm health. Studies in aquatic systems reveal copper’s toxicity to fish and invertebrates at surprisingly low concentrations. Research has shown copper hydroxide should always be applied in line with safety guidelines, rotating with other fungicides to prevent environmental buildup. Some long-term studies suggest copper residues can affect crop growth, pushing the field towards more sustainable use practices. Government agencies review copper hydroxide products regularly, weighing benefits and risks to maintain safe food production.
Environmental awareness and regulatory pressures drive innovation in copper hydroxide production and application. Formulators are developing slow-release versions and blends that keep copper available to plants but reduce leaching into water systems. Researchers look for copper alternatives, yet growers still depend on copper hydroxide for disease control in organic and conventional systems where synthetic fungicides fall short. Advances in precision agriculture promise improved targeting, shrinking overall copper inputs per acre. In the lab, copper hydroxide serves as a building block for new catalytic converters, energy materials, and even antibacterial coatings. The push for greener chemistry and circular use means people will continue rethinking how to recycle and reduce copper use, challenging future generations of scientists and industry leaders to refine an already storied compound.
Copper hydroxide stands out as one of those substances most people never think about, even though it quietly shapes large parts of the modern world. With its pale blue color and solid presence, this compound steps up in several places, most recognizably in agriculture and, more subtly, in industry and science classrooms. Most folks who have spent time on a farm or even in their backyard garden have probably benefited from it—whether they knew it or not.
Out in the fields, plants get attacked by all sorts of bacterial and fungal intruders. Copper hydroxide helps farmers give their crops a fighting chance. Throw in a bit of heavy rain, late blight shows up on the potatoes, and suddenly a crop meant to feed hundreds stands at risk. After the leaf sprayer moves through, the plants look coated with a blue dust. What’s left behind acts almost like a tiny shield against fungi and bacteria. No surprise that large areas of grapevines, tomatoes, and citrus trees all rely on it as part of their disease management. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, growers around the world keep turning to copper-based products, not just because they help, but because many synthetic chemicals burn out their usefulness after a few seasons due to resistance.
Step out of the orchard and into city infrastructure, and you’ll spot it doing another job. In some cases, copper hydroxide finds its way into water treatment. Here, it works on keeping harmful bugs at bay, giving communities an extra layer of defense. Over at the paint shop, this compound helps create special pigments, giving coatings a bright, lasting blue. Boat owners who want to keep barnacles at bay brush on anti-fouling paints containing copper hydroxide. Without this, maintenance costs balloon and fuel use goes up, showing that even tiny details make a big difference over time.
The lumber yard can be another unexpected meeting spot. Wood intended for outdoor use faces a constant battle with rot and insects. The manufacturers who pressure-treat lumber often add copper hydroxide in the process. This translates to less waste and fewer trees cut down, benefits that ripple far beyond one construction project.
Back in high school chemistry class, many students first make or see copper hydroxide as part of hands-on experiments. Watching blue-green precipitate drift down through a beaker helps drive home basic principles of reactions. More than that, these early lessons spark curiosity, showing just how connected the natural and human-made worlds really are. Having a firsthand look at how basic compounds like this one work builds a foundation for better choices, whether that student goes on to be a scientist, farmer, or someone who just enjoys a healthy garden.
People worry about the buildup of metals in the soil over time, so using copper hydroxide responsibly forms part of the bigger story. Rotating crops, following guidelines set by expert agencies, and investing in research for new disease control methods matter more now than ever. Farm advisers and environmental scientists now work hand in hand with growers, weighing crop needs against long-term soil health. This focus on stewardship comes straight from real-world experience, not just from research papers.
Every season brings challenges, but practical tools like copper hydroxide help us manage them. Mixing old knowledge with new insights often gives the best shot at tomorrow’s harvest and a safer environment outside the farm gate.
Copper hydroxide works as a fungicide, playing a visible role in commercial agriculture and backyard gardens. Walk into an orchard after spraying, and you might spot a bluish residue clinging to leaves and fruit. That’s copper hydroxide, not just a trick of the light. Farmers and gardeners turn to it to fight plant diseases like downy mildew and bacterial spot, which feed on weak plants and spread fast when the weather flips to wet and shady. The logic—stop the fungi, save the crop—sounds simple enough, but the conversation shouldn’t end at disease control.
My own experience raising tomatoes taught me to respect copper hydroxide’s strength. A heavy-handed spray or poor timing can leave the leaves scorched and growth stunted. Concentration matters. The fungus-killing ability comes with a price; too much copper builds up and blocks roots from getting vital nutrients. Research from the University of California backs this up—using more than directed can do more damage than the disease itself. So, the real trick isn’t just adding copper but understanding the limit. It's best to use only the smallest amount necessary, follow application labels, and avoid spraying right before rain, to keep runoff out of nearby water and soil.
Start talking with veteran gardeners and some will warn about copper toxicity in soil. Soil acts like a sponge, soaking up not just nutrients, but also any copper that washes off leaves. Over years, that accumulation can act like salt, making it harder for plants to pull in iron and other metals they need. The University of Florida’s research points out that soils with a history of heavy copper use see stunted root growth, failed seeds, and leaf curl. I’ve seen patches in home gardens where flowers once grew thick start thinning out, right after seasons with repeated copper sprays. That kind of loss creeps up—not sudden, but steady.
Beekeepers worry about copper fungicides too. Sprays that don’t dry quickly or hit blooms can harm bees—both the ones we manage and wild pollinators. University trials have traced lower bee activity and smaller broods in hives set next to copper-treated fields during bloom. Ladybugs, lacewings, and earthworms take a hit from repeated copper exposure. Those bugs aren't just background—they keep pest numbers down and recycle organic matter back into the soil.
Some growers have found ways to cut copper’s risks. They rotate different fungicides—using copper only as a last defense. Others time sprays for late afternoon or early morning, aiming for dry leaves and fewer pollinators in the field. Compost and organic matter help buffer soil, reducing copper uptake by plants. Drip irrigation, instead of overhead watering, keeps leaves drier and slows the fungal spread, cutting back on the need for fungicide in the first place.
An honest look at copper hydroxide reveals real benefits, but also real drawbacks if used carelessly. Whether growing a hundred acres or five tomato plants on a balcony, it pays to understand both the power and the limits of the blue dust. Controlled use and regular soil checks can keep plants healthier over time, while still protecting the pollinators and worms who do so much of the quiet work in our gardens and fields.
Farming brings a batch of daily challenges, and fungal diseases never take a day off. When leaf spots or blight threaten your fields, copper hydroxide can offer real help. This blue-green compound has kept crops healthy for decades. It acts by blocking key enzymes in fungi, breaking their lifecycles, and helping your plants hold onto their vitality. No magic involved—just science and a steady hand.
My family learned early on that rushing the mixing process never pays off. Clean, cool water always works best for dissolving copper hydroxide powder or wettable granules. Clumps can clog sprayers, so take time to stir the slurry until it’s as smooth as paint. Measuring by weight, not eye, ensures you don’t end up over- or underdosing—a scale in the shed saves a lot of trouble. Local guides or labels explain how much to use per hectare. Sticking to those numbers keeps plants safe while giving pathogens a tough time.
Best results show up when you cover leaves thoroughly, including the undersides—diseases love hiding out there. Spraying in calm conditions stops drift and waste. After a rainstorm, it’s smart to check if another round is needed. Heavy rain strips copper off leaves fast, weakening protection. A small sprayer works just fine for garden beds, while orchardists gear up with tractor rigs to reach every branch.
Early in my career, I tried spraying in the heat of the day and paid for it. Leaves scorched, and young plants drooped. Now, I always stick to early morning or evening, when the sun’s not blasting. This avoids damage to tender growth and helps copper stick better. Consistent application—every seven to ten days in a wet season—keeps pressure low and stops problems before they get out of hand.
Copper is not just another garden product you toss around. Residue buildup in soil can stack risks for worms, microbes, and waterways. Early on, I made mistakes and watched runoff turn the pond blue—that experience made me rethink how I spray along field edges. Using just enough to get the job done, along with buffer strips, lessens runoff. Rotating copper sprays with products approved for organic use helps prevent copper overload in fields.
Good gloves, goggles, and covered skin do more than keep stains off your hands: they protect your health. Washing up after spraying keeps copper out of your eyes and lungs. It’s wise to keep pets and kids out of treated zones until leaves dry off. Local extension officers can always help with specific tips about safe intervals between spraying and harvest time.
Copper hydroxide stands out as a workhorse fungicide, but it pays to treat it with respect. Following mixing recommendations and being careful with application avoids setbacks. Safe habits in storage and handling, along with care for soil and water health, ensure this old standby keeps working for farmers—without causing new headaches down the line. In my view, thoughtful use of copper means crops and communities benefit together.
Copper hydroxide pops up in many labs and farms, mostly recognized for its bright blue-green color and strong reputation as a fungicide. At first glance, it might seem harmless. The truth is, this compound can stir up more trouble than many folks realize if handled without respect.
From personal experience running plant tissue trials, gloves were the first line of defense. Upon the first accidental contact, my skin started itching and turned red before I washed it off. Even brief touches can cause skin irritation. Goggles shield the eyes from dust and splashes. A simple lab coat spares your clothes and body. Dust masks or respirators become essential if working in poorly ventilated spaces or when measuring out large quantities. Breathing in copper hydroxide particles leads to coughing and, eventually, more serious lung problems.
It’s easy to let your guard down outside. On a farm, I saw workers mix copper hydroxide with bare hands. Later, one man started getting a rash spreading from his fingers up his arms. Skin isn’t the only worry. This compound burns eyes in seconds and can permanently damage vision. Washing stations near work areas should never be considered optional luxuries—one fast rinse can make the difference between redness and a trip to the emergency room.
Many people tuck chemicals away in sheds or cabinets near fertilizer piles, without much thought. Here’s the problem: copper hydroxide reacts with acids and some organic materials, releasing toxic fumes. I once saw a leak cause a minor headache outbreak in the neighboring room. My advice—keep it dry and away from sunlight, chemicals, or open flames. Good ventilation in storage spaces matters. Keeping the original containers sealed tight, labeled, and out of reach of children and pets avoids confusion and accidents, especially in multi-use facilities.
Dumping leftover copper hydroxide down the drain may seem clean, but once it enters water systems, it kills fish and disrupts ecosystems. Municipal disposal programs usually accept hazardous waste; they know how to treat it. Rural communities often struggle to access these services, so it helps to connect with local farm bureaus or co-ops for safe collection days. From watching old classmates botch clean-ups, I can tell you—train everyone on proper disposal so the burden doesn’t fall on one forgetful worker.
People learn safety by example and through simple, regular reminders. Clear instructions and clearly marked safety equipment nearby set the right tone. Sticking to only as much chemical as needed, no more, leaves less to handle later. If someone does get exposed, don’t wait or experiment. Get to a doctor, take the container along for proper identification, and share any information about the compound.
Staying safe with copper hydroxide boils down to familiarity with its hazards, respect for those around you, and honest diligence in storage, use, and disposal. Mistakes add up quickly; taking a few minutes for safety now saves real trouble down the line.Out in the field, every decision about chemistry has a ripple effect on the crops and the people working with them. With disease pressure from bacteria and fungi always looming, copper hydroxide has earned its spot as a trusted fungicide and bactericide. But most folks looking to boost control don’t just stop at copper. Questions pop up in every farm shed—can it go in the same tank as other pesticides or not?
I’ve spent years watching growers try to stretch every dollar and save every pass across the field. People want convenience—throwing everything into one tank mix makes sense with diesel and labor both scarce and costly. But before reaching for another bottle, it pays to know that not every mix plays nicely. Some combinations can lock up copper, turning it into sludge on the bottom of the sprayer. Sometimes the physical compatibility looks fine—no clumping, no fizzing—only to find out later the biological effect is weaker or even harmful for the crop.
Here’s what I’ve learned: Certain insecticides and fungicides can react with copper hydroxide. Products with a strong alkaline base (like some phosphorous acid or metalaxyl formulations) can break down the copper, which means leftover residues or, worse, less disease control. Mixing with certain oils or surfactants might burn tender leaves, especially in hot or humid weather. If tank water is hard, copper ions can bind to calcium or magnesium and settle out, so the mix never reaches the leaf surface. That’s product lost and target pests unchecked. On vegetables, these mistakes can torch the leaves or stunt growth, carving into margins.
No one likes wading through dense pesticide labels, but there’s no shortcut. Most manufacturers clearly state which products work well together. Extension offices collect field reports every year on how combinations turn out on real farms, not just test plots. Growers who jump straight to their own tank mixing experiments sometimes get burned by unexpected leaf spotting or lowered yields. Even mixing small amounts, waiting ten minutes, and checking for gelling has saved more than a few folks from clogging an expensive sprayer.
Instead of guessing, it pays off to lean on credible sources. State cooperative extensions, local agronomists, and manufacturer hotline reps talk to hundreds of operators each year and keep running tallies of what really works. Rather than experimenting on a whole field at once, running a small test plot with a new mix gives clear answers. Field notebooks (even the messy ones) track what worked last year. Rotating chemical groups and staggering applications instead of mixing everything at once reduces the risk of resistance too.
At the end of the day, each spray is a decision that affects long-term soil health, worker safety, and profit. Reading the labels, talking with trusted advisors, and keeping records turn a confusing question into confident results. Every season brings new weeds, bugs, and diseases, but careful mixing gives a better shot at a healthy harvest.


| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Copper(II) dihydroxide |
| Other names |
Cupric hydroxide
Cu(OH)2 Copper(II) hydroxide |
| Pronunciation | /ˈkɒpər haɪˈdrɒksaɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 20427-59-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 358731 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:32597 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201643 |
| ChemSpider | 87638 |
| DrugBank | DB11148 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03aa19ec-cc48-48a5-a3c5-1e126dc9c7c2 |
| EC Number | 215-137-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: 548 |
| KEGG | C16565 |
| MeSH | D003897 |
| PubChem CID | 159825 |
| RTECS number | GL8040000 |
| UNII | N8Z6TQ73J1 |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | CompTox Dashboard (EPA) of product 'Copper Hydroxide': **DTXSID3040009** |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | Cu(OH)2 |
| Molar mass | 97.56 g/mol |
| Appearance | Blue powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 2.09 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | -2.57 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.75 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | −1.6×10⁻⁵ |
| Viscosity | Viscous suspension |
| Dipole moment | 3.50 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 78.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | −130.5 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | C01XA02 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause fire or explosion; strong oxidizer. Harmful if swallowed, inhaled, or in contact with skin. Causes serious eye and skin irritation. Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P260, P261, P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P312, P330, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364, P391, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-0-2-N |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat: 780 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral rat LD50: 1,100 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | BCT180 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Copper Hydroxide: "1 mg/m³ (as copper dusts and mists) |
| REL (Recommended) | 2.0 kg a.i./ha |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Copper(II) oxide
Copper(II) carbonate Copper(II) sulfate Basic copper carbonate |